The two main sources for this article are Who Started WW2? by Udo Walendy (pages 120–124), 1939 – The War That Had Many Fathers by Gerd Schultze-Rhonhof (pages 206–226).
If one were to go by what the Holocaust fabulists say, they would be led to believe that Hitler was to blame for escalation of the tense situation in Europe in the late 1930s. However, as regular readers will already know, Holocaust fabulists omit critical information and context and attempt to hide the fact they are doing so. As such, I must tie up a few loose ends before we get into the annexation of Czechoslovakia.
To start I’d like to share this interaction I had with with Bing Copilot AI:
As you can see, Copilot has been programmed to repeat the Holocaust fabulist line that Germany was to blame for WW2. It has also been programmed to shoehorn in that opinion when not asked! However, unlike some humans who believe the kosher narrative of WW2, Copilot has the ability to admit when it is leaving out context.
If you don’t know how Czechoslovakia mistreated its ethnic minorities, then you haven’t read parts 1–3 of this series, so you better do that now. That way you can bask in the absurdity the following statement from Winston Churchill gave to the public on October 16th, 1938, after the the return of Sudeten Germans to Germany:
All the world wishes for peace and security. Have we gained it by the sacrifice of the Czechoslovak Republic. Here was the model democratic State of Central Europe, a country where minorities were treated better than anywhere else. It has been deserted, destroyed and devoured. It is now being digested. The question which is of interest to a lot of ordinary people, common people, is whether this destruction of the Czechoslovak Republic will bring upon the world a blessing or a curse. (My emphasis added.)
Churchill’s pretense of world peace falls flat when he is obviously lying to stir up anti-German sentiment.
On September 30, 1938, during the Munich conference, Chamberlain asked Hitler in a private conference to sign a declaration of friendship between their countries—a pact to never wage war with each other, and to settle future disputes by way of British-German consultations. Today kosher historians point to Hitler declaring the rest of Czechoslovakia to be a German protectorate as a breach of the pact while ignoring Britain rearming immediately after the conference in order to prepare for war with Germany. In fact, it is admitted that the Munich Conference provided “breathing space” for Britain to rearm:
In the 1930s, the UK painted Hitler as an expansionist who needed to be stopped. That false characterization continues to this day, which is funny when you consider the massive extent of the British empire, which at its peak in the 1920s included over 500 million inhabitants around the globe. Critique of colonialism is outside of the scope of this article; however, it is laughable to say that UK colonizing lands in Africa is more justified than Hitler reunifying lands with historical connections to and a border with Germany.
There is significant historical evidence that refutes the idea of Hitler as an aggressive expansionist. For example, Hitler did not want to get involved with the dispute Slovakia had with Czechoslovakia because Germany has no historical connection with Slovakia. On March 13th, 1939, Hitler met with Jozef Tiso, a Slovak politician. To Tiso, Hitler stated, “You see how things stand. I have no designs on Slovakia. It has never belonged to Germany, and I will not deploy a single German solider for it unless it beseech me to guarantee its borders. But then Slovakia must also quite clearly say weather it want is that or not.” That level of asking for consent would make a third wave feminist proud.
Up until that point, the extent of Hitler’s “aggressive expansionism” was reunifying the German people, all without military conflict. What the real issue for the Allies was is that the Treaty of Versailles was meant to neuter Germany and remove her from competing on the world stage. Hitler refused to be cowed by it. Where Hitler should be seen as a hero for rising up against the injustice leveled by the Allies, he is instead demonized for acts for which he is not guilty.
Was the annexation of remainder of Czechoslovakia proof of aggressive expansionism since it had no historical ties to the region? For the answer to that, stay tuned for my next installment in my “Who Started WW2” series. (Although I’m sure regular readers will already know the correct answer.)